中国英语考试网
  当前位置:首页>>LSAT>>LSAT试题>> 正文
LSAT考试全真题二 SECTION 3(7)
文章出处:  发布时间:2006-07-09

 
 (A) The members of a single class of organisms that inhabit the same environment must be identical in all their external body features
 (B) The members of a single class of organisms must exhibit one or more similar external body features that differentiate that class from all other classes of organisms.
 (C) It is only as a result of adaptation to similar environments that one class of organisms develops external body features similar to those of another class of organisms.
 (D) An organism does not necessarily belong to a class simply because the organism has one or more external body features similar to those of members of that class
 (E) Whenever two classes of organisms share the same environment members of one class will differ from members of the other class in several external body features.
  
 22. Further evidence bearing on Jamison's activities must have come to light. On the basis of previously available evidence alone, it would have been impossible to prove that Jamison was a party to the fraud, and Jamison's active involvement in the fraud has now been definitively established.

 The pattern of reasoning exhibited in the argument above most closely parallels that exhibited in which one of the following?
 
 (A) Smith must not have purchased his house within the last year. He is listed as the owner of that house on the old list of property owners and anyone on the old list could not have purchased his or her property within the last year.
 (B) Turner must not have taken her usual train to Nantes today. Had she done so she could not have been in Nates until this afternoon but she was seen having cofiee in Nantes at 11 o'clock this morning.
 (C) Nofris must have lied when she said that she had not a authorized the investigation. There is no doubt that she did authorize it and authorizing an investigation is not something anyone is likely to have forgotten
 (D) Waugh must have knon that last night's class was canceled Waugh was in she library yesterday and it would have been impossible for anyone in the library not to have seen the cancellation notices.
 (E) Laforte must deeply resented being passed over for promotion. He maintains otherwise, but only someone who felt badly treated would have made the kind of remark Laforte made at yesterday's meeting
 
 23. Reporting on a civil war a journalist encountered evidence that refugees were starving because the govern,ent would not permit food shipments to a rebel-held area. Government censors deleted all mention of the government's role in the starvation from the journalist's report which had not implicated either nature or the rebels in the starvation. The journalist concluded that it was ethically permissible to file the censored report because the journalist's news agency would precede it with the notice "Cleared by government censors"

 Which one of the following ethical criteria if valid would serve to support the yournalist's conclusion whilc placing the least constraint on the flow of reported information?
  
 (A) It is ethical in general to report known facts but unethical to do so while omitting other known facts if the omitted facts would substanually alter an impression of a person or instiution that would be congruent with the reported facts.
 (B) In a situation of conflict, it is ethical to report known facts and unethical to fail to report known facts that would tend to exonerate party to the conflict
 (C) In a situation of censorship, it is unethical make any report if the government represented by the censor deletes from the report material unfavorable to that government
  共8页: 上一页 [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] 7 [8] 下一页